Today, the Supreme Court of Canada released a much-anticipated decision in Davis & Co. v. Monarch Entertainment Corporation. The case is of particular interest to lawyers practising in the field of commercial law because it has clarified the obligations owed…
In Kerr v. Loblaws Inc., the Ontario Court of Appeal was asked to set aside a jury’s dismissal of a claim for personal injury damages. The plaintiff had slipped on a single grape at a Zehr’s store operated by Loblaws….
In three separate applications that were heard together, Madam Justice Elizabeth Stewart of the Superior Court ruled on the scope of an insurer’s examination under oath of a statutory accident benefits claimant. Such examinations are authorized by s. 33(1.1) of the…
In a ruling that is certain to send a chill through the plaintiffs’ bar, Madam Justice Anne Molloy has ordered a solicitor who was representing a disability insurance claimant to pay costs of an abortive third party proceeding against the…
Minister of Finance v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company of Canada contains an interesting discussion of what an insurance company must do before it can terminate an auto policy for non-payment of premiums. (Perhaps the word, “interesting” in the last sentence…
In Moss v. Hutchinson & Associates, Mr. Justice Peter Howden has ruled that benefits received by a plaintiff from the Ontario Disability Support Program (“ODSP”) are not deductible from an award of tort damages. The action arose out of a…
In Biancale v. Vieyra, Mr. Justice David Crane dismissed a plaintiff’s motion to add, as a defendant in the proceeding, one of two drivers involved in the accident in which the plaintiff had been injured. The amendment was sought after…
A new decision of the Ontario Superior Court is a painful reminder to auto insurers of the importance of following the correct procedure in terminating statutory accident benefits. The failure of the insurer to use the correct form of notice…
UPDATE: this decision was reversed by the Court of Appeal on July 17, 2009. The reasons of the Court may be accessed here. The panel agreed that, the plaintiff having had a Glasgow Coma Scale reading of 9/15 within a…
In Guindon v. VIA Rail, an interesting (but unusual) case, Master Robert Beaudoin ordered that ViIA Rail was not bound by the deemed undertaking rule (Rule 30.1) where the plaintiff had uttered threats in the course of an independent medical…