In brief supplementary reasons, given in Wright v. Hannon (the original reasons for judgment can be accessed here), Mr. Justice Randall S. Echlin held (or perhaps “confirmed” would be a better word), that statutory accident death benefits are properly characterized as “non-pecuniary” payments and so, are not deductible from an award of tort damages. Such benefits are, he said, “paid ‘in recognition of the values of life’ and therefore are clearly not deductible.” He felt that this issue had already been determined by the 2002 decision of Justice Spiegel in Di Girolamo v. Smolen. (That decision was also applied, to similar effect, in the 2004 case of Carter v. Sanders.)
Similar Posts
ODSP Benefits Not Deductible from MVA Damages
In Moss v. Hutchinson & Associates, Mr. Justice Peter Howden has ruled that benefits received by a plaintiff from the Ontario Disability Support Program (“ODSP”) are not deductible from an award of tort damages. The action arose out of a…
Threshold Decision Favours Plaintiff But Jury Sees Case Differently
Regular readers of our Updates know that just when insurance defence lawyers and their clients were beginning to despair of ever winning a threshold motion, a series of decisions were handed down that favoured the defence. But a Superior Court…
AB Settlements Can Be Rescinded at Any Time
We have attached a copy of the decision in Navage v. Pilot Insurance, just released by the Ontario Superior Court. It deals with the consequences of an insurer’s failure to comply fully with the provisions of s. 9.1 of a former…
- Auto | Collateral Benefits | Discovery | Insurance News | Practice and Procedure | Privacy | Privilege
Must Insurer Maintain “Firewall” Between Tort and No-Fault Claims?
In Trecartin v. Pilot Insurance Company, Mr. Justice George T. Valin considered the position of an insurer defending both a tort action and an accident benefits claim brought by the same plaintiff. In the no-fault action, the insurer, Pilot Insurance, was…
Disability Benefits Reduce Uninsured Limits
The Court of Appeal today released its decision in Kosanovic v. Wawanesa Insurance, a copy of which we have attached. The decision involved an interpretation of the former s. 2(1)(b) of Ont. Reg. 676. That regulation deals with “Uninsured Automobile…
DAC Assessment Does Not Preclude Insurer’s IME in SABS Lawsuit
In Baron v. Kingsway General Insurance Company, Superior Court Justice Gladys Pardu rejected the argument of a statutory accident benefits claimant, that the insurer was not entitled to its own medical assessment because a CAT-DAC assessment had already found him…