In two decisions, released today, a five-member panel of the Court of Appeal has held that the Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Fund is, for limited purposes, an “insurer”. The cases are Allstate Insurance Company of Canada v. Motor Vehicle Accident…
Last April, we began a post by remarking that “The law firm of Kramer Henderson had a very good day today.” Mr. Justice John Belleghem had allowed an appeal from a decision of an assessment office and had allowed a…
FURTHER UPDATE–We understand that the appeal from this decision was heard by the Court of Appeal on October 31, 2007. We’ll report on the appeal decision as soon as it becomes available. UPDATED–Since the original post, some additional discussion of the…
In Royal & SunAlliance Insurance v. Wawanesa Mutual Insurance Company, Superior Court Justice Frank Newbould has ruled that a loss transfer claim by one Ontario insurer against another, arising out of a car accident that took place in Vermont, is…
Addendum: The decision discussed in this post was reversed by the Court of Appeal on May 2, 2008. The Court of Appeal noted that the plaintiff’s solicitor had always intended to sue the municipality having jurisdiction over the road in…
In an interesting decision, Mr. Justice David Brown has ruled that a fleet policy issued by Royal & SunAlliance provided uninsured motorist coverage to an employee of Royal’s named insured. The employee had been injured while pouring gasoline into the…
In Daly v. ING Halifax Insurance Company, the Court of Appeal held that hourly rates for attendant care are set by the Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule and cannot be challenged. The Court accepted the insurer’s argument, that section 50(10) of…
Schouten v. Rideau.pdf Two members of the Superior Court bench in Ottawa have released reasons, both dated December 1, 2006, in which they have commented in detail on how costs should be fixed under Rule 57.03. There are some interesting differences…
In Cumis General Insurance Company v. 1319273 Ontario Ltd., Mr. Justice David Brown dealt with an interesting coverage dispute. Cumis had applied for a ruling on whether it owed a duty to defend its insured, the numbered company, in an…
Another successful Civil Litigation Update concluded at Chateau Montebello yesterday. The conference, now in its 26th year, was acclaimed by numerous visiting Superior Court and Court of Appeal judges as Ontario’s premiere continuing legal education program. We are proud…