Representing insurance companies is getting more hazardous all the time. In Succar v. Wawanesa Mutual Insurance Company, the plaintiff had sued Wawanesa for statutory accident benefits arising out of an MVA that occurred on January 1, 1994. Wawanesa had stopped…
ADDENDUM This decision has been appealed. The notice of appeal was served on November 28, 2006. So, it appears that the Court of Appeal will be re-visiting the issue of waiver of subrogation in a builder’s risk context. The appeal…
REVISION We have now obtained the unreported reasons of Mr. Justice Paul Lalonde, the motions judge, whose decision was reversed by the Court of Appeal. Those reasons shed quite a bit of light on what transpired in this case. Accordingly, we have…
In Oxford Mutual Insurance Company v. Co-operators General Insurance Company, released today, the Court of Appeal had to decide whether a claimant was “principally dependent” on his mother at the time of being injured in a motor vehicle accident. If…
Mr. Justice Roydon J. Kealey of the Superior Court has granted summary judgment, dismissing the plaintiff’s action in Ideal Roofing Company v. Royal & SunAlliance Insurance Company. Our office acted for Royal, the successful moving party. The basis of the…
In a decision that will be of great interest to the insurance and personal injury bar, the Court of Appeal today released its reasons in McIntyre v. Grigg et al. In this case, the plaintiff was a pedestrian who suffered a…
ADDENDUM Since our original post about this case, we were advised by Doug Smith, counsel for the defence, about some additional and pertinent facts. His comment appears at the end of this post but, in a nutshell, he told us…
In a brief decision, Master Dash addressed an issue that often arises, in one way or another, in insurance litigation. Although the expression does not appear in the reasons, the issue in this case arose out of what is often…
In a post yesterday, we commented on a recent decision, Bisier v. Thorimbert, in which a Superior Court judge granted a defence threshold motion at the trial of a personal injury action, after the jury had awarded nothing for general or…
Ontario Superior Court Justice Joan Lax has released an interesting costs decision in Manning v. Epp et al. In this lawsuit, the plaintiff was well-known Ontario lawyer, Morris Manning. He sued the mayor of the City of Waterloo, as well…